Return Home
Volume IV - Issue X
October 2008
Covering the Interests of Boomers in Western Montana
.

Member

Cromwell Dixon -1892-1911 - A Boy & His Plane

“Daring Aviator Will Attempt Perilous Feat of Mountain Crossing,”

Cromwell Dixon awoke on October 1, 1911, as the talk and toast of Helena, Montana. This child prodigy turned aviator had become the first pilot to fly across the Continental Divide, in his aeroplane, the Little Hummingbird. Five days earlier, the Helena Independent declared that this 19-year-old daredevil pilot had given “the greatest exhibition ever seen in Northwest.” Now, he had truly outdone himself. He was a nationally recognized aviation hero.

Martin Kidston – a present day reporter for the Helena Independent – has taken a forgotten page in aviation history and authored it into a light, enjoyable read, Cromwell Dixon, A Boy & His Plane, 1892-1911. In the process, Kidston shows that Dixon was a boy aviator in name only; he was seasoned and intuitive beyond his years.

Cromwell Dixon was a true child prodigy. As a boy, he built his own roller coaster and charged the neighborhood children a penny a ride. At 11-years-old, fascinated with flying, he constructed two motor-driven bicycles. His first invention came to him when he was just 14 years old. Powered by pedals and a propeller, steered with a rudder connected to the handlebars, the boy designed and built a “sky bicycle.” Its balloon was cut from a huge silk baggy; similar to contemporary hot air blimps, it was filled with gas, and then fastened to a wooden frame.

After experimenting with the “sky bicycle,” Dixon became an exhibition pilot. Because Cromwell wasn’t old enough to be licensed, he had to convince his mother, Annie Wooten Dixon, to co-sign a contract with the Curtiss Exhibition Company of New York. Reluctant at first, she finally agreed, and on August 31, 1911, he was awarded just the forty-third pilot’s license issued in the United States. At nineteen, he was the youngest licensed aviator in the country – perhaps even the world.

A confident Dixon pushed the limits of his flying machine – not much more than a shabby wooden box enveloped by chicken wire – and soon, he perfected the “Dixon Corkscrew,” an aerial exercise in which he would circle down from 8,000 feet, pull up, and level off just before landing. Cromwell’s celebrity even caught the attention of President William Howard Taft who invited the entire Dixon family out to a large dinner the night before an exhibition.

“Daring Aviator Will Attempt Perilous Feat of Mountain Crossing,” trumpeted the headlines in the Helena Independent on September 28, 1911. Curious spectators clustered at the Montana State Fairgrounds to watch Cromwell take off; others had already built a fire on the opposite side of the divide to help Cromwell identify his landing spot.

The teenager charted his famous flight over the divide thirsting to obtain the $10,000 offered by local executives as compensation to the first aviator to traverse the Continental Divide. Throngs of people gathered to see the famous boy wonder at the Montana State Fairgrounds in Helena, on September 30. One day earlier, he had enthralled much of the same audience with his daring aerial acrobatics. Ordinarily, when flying, the lanky, slender youth would wear his black-and-gray checkered cap turned backwards, but on this day, he wore a wool aviator’s crest, flannel-lined aviator’s jacket, and fur gloves.

A crisp, vivid, windless autumn morning provided the backdrop as multitudes of fans watched Dixon – determined to prove his talents as a pilot and make a name in aviation circles – twist up to 7,000 feet, and whorl out of sight. He flew west of Helena and landed successfully on the west side of Mullan Pass, in a field. By guiding his fragile Curtiss bi-wing plane over the Continental Divide, the Ohio-born teenager made history, becoming the first person to cross the Rocky Mountains.

Following his successful sojourn, he flew back to the fairgrounds where “a greater ovation than ever before given anyone at the fairgrounds was accorded Dixon when he mounted the platform,” The Helena Independent reported. “Governor Norris publicly congratulated Dixon and declared that he was without a peer in the realm of the air. Dixon, as usual, blushed furiously, but the cries of the crowd for a speech went unanswered.”

On October 2, 1911, just two days after his famous crossing, Dixon was killed when his aircraft was caught in a downdraft while performing an aerial stunt at the Spokane Interstate Fairgrounds. The bi-plane encountered a strong, unexpected updraft, plunging it toward the ground, crushing the 19-year-old pilot under the heavy engine.

In Cromwell Dixon, A Boy & His Plane, Martin Kidston draws repeated parallels to Dixon’s life to Icarus, a character in Greek mythology. “Like the tale of Icarus,” writes Kidston, “Dixon’s story is one of great daring, accomplishment, and tragedy.”

Icarus was the son of Daedalus, and he is most remembered for his attempt to escape Crete by flight, which ended in a tumble to his death. Icarus and his father attempted to flee from his exile in Crete, where the pair languished in prison at the instruction of King Minos.

Daedalus assembled two sets of waxwings, one for himself and the other for his son. Before they took off from the island, Daedalus warned his son not to fly too close to the sun or the sea. Overcome by the sublimity that flying gave him, an overjoyed Icarus soared through the sky; just as his dad had feared, he came too close to the sun, which melted his wings. Icarus kept fluttering furiously but soon realized that his wings had no feathers left, and that he was doomed to flapping his bare arms. He then plummeted into the sea.

The short, little known saga of Cromwell Dixon’s aviation story is brought to life in Kidston’s succinct 168-page account. Drawing heavily, if not solely, on newspapers clippings, the aviator’s brief existence is explained to the reader with sensitivity, ingenuity, and compassion, constructing an abbreviated but remarkable timeline for a life that can now be re-appreciated.

Cromwell Dixon Timeline

* July 9, 1892: Cromwell Dixon is born in Columbus, Ohio.

* Cromwell Dixon, as a boy, builds his own roller coaster and charges the neighborhood children a penny a ride.

* 1903: Dixon invents a motor-driven bicycle, just two years after the first commercial production of motorcycles by the Indian Motorcycle Company in 1901.

* December 17, 1903: Orville and Wilbur Wright achieve the first powered flight at Kitty Hawk.

* May 1907: Cromwell Dixon flies the Skycycle, a small dirigible that he built, powered by a bicycle and propeller at the Columbus Driving Park.

* October 22, 1907: Dixon flies the Skycycle from the Aero Grounds in St. Louis, Missouri, and is blown across the Mississippi River.

* 1911: Dixon is in the 1911 class of the Curtiss Aeroplane Company’s aviation school.

* July 9, 1911: Cromwell Dixon is issued a pilot’s license from the Aero Club of America, License Number 43.

* August 1911: Cromwell Dixon flies for the Grand Island Merchants’ Association in Grand Island, Nebraska.

* September 1911: Cromwell Dixon appears in Helena, Montana, to perform aerial feats in his Curtiss pusher, Little Hummingbird, for the Montana State Fair.

* September 30, 1911: Cromwell Dixon is the first pilot to cross the Continental Divide.

* October 2, 1911: Cromwell Dixon is killed when his aeroplane crashes during an exhibition flight at the Washington Interstate Fair in Spokane.

Perhaps the finest hour of Dixon’s life took place just before tragedy struck, when all was certainly possible, and he was invigorated with the excitement of his recent achievements in Montana. In fact, Helena residents have not forgotten about this bright young inventor and brave, precocious pilot who amazed them with a stunt-flying, fast-paced life: a campground on top of MacDonald Pass, near the Continental Divide, was recently named in his honor; a plaque at the Helena airport commemorates his flight.

BACK

Missoula Art Beat: Shaun Bell

UM photojournalist documents hopeful, promising Africa

Coups, conflicts and corruption... these three words sum up the news themes Americans receive related to social, political, and economic happenings in Africa. These problems typify a pattern of failure that has plagued the Dark Continent in the quarter-century since most of its nations became independent. Indeed, there’s no denying deep troubles beleaguer even the most developed countries such as Zimbabwe, Kenya, and South Africa; the prospects for most of the continent’s other places appear bleak.

Nonetheless, another Africa exists, one of promise, beauty, optimism and transition. University of Montana sophomore photojournalist Shane Bell documented this Africa over the course of five weeks spent there this summer. In fact, he has more than four thousand photos to share of hope and healing.

Explains Bell: “I had the chance to blend my love of language, international culture, political theory and photojournalism, with the passion and the mindset to see and understand Africa. I’ve always wanted to see the faces, cultures, and people of Africa, and I want to relay those images of another world back here.

“My generation needs to care more about things in order to get things to change in the world.”

Bell traveled to Africa as part of a larger contingent of members of a group called Launch Out Ministries. Upon arriving, he was fast reminded of the land’s wide potential for unvarnished danger.

“I had six vaccinations before I left. There’s known to be malaria all over Zambia, and if bitten there, you can be dead within 12 hours. A mosquito bit me as I was getting off the plane; I was thinking ‘okay, God, my faith is in you here.’

The problems of one African nation, by and large, are similar to those that afflict the entire continent: abject poverty, rampant corruption, gross mismanagement, tribal enmity, uncontrolled population growth. But, in spite of this assessment, Bell feels that the continent can and will somehow break out of the vicious cycle of political instability and moral neglect. And instead of taking the negative route, he tried to photograph the positive winds of change slowly blowing across the dry Saharan plains.

“It’s easy to focus on the pandemics and the genocides and how terrible things are, but people are making changes there in some countries. Yes, it’s a very impoverished and corrupt continent, but change is certainly possible.

“The power of images impacts people, it can move nations. That’s what I love about photography.”

Bell’s photographic images tell the basic human anecdote of smiles, friendship, affection, hospitality, opportunity, and the brazenness of hope.

“The people aren’t unhappy there,” says Bell. “And Africans are extremely affectionate. It was a shock at first because people are so nice, so hospitable. I saw poor families giving up crates of cold Coca-Colas. People that have nothing were giving up everything. I was blown away.”

Bell says he covered quite a bit of ground in short amounts of time, adventuring in Tanzania, Zanzibar Island, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, and South Africa, and he says the journey, while missionary in nature, wasn’t solely about proselytizing people; it was as much about helping Africans better comprehend neglected health and social issues.

“The program has good objectives,” says Bell.

In Zimbabwe, he saw firsthand the effects of President Robert Mugabe’s tyrannical despotism. “I was there in the middle of June, and watched displaced families and some of the poor people who he has threatened. There were so many grocery stores with no food on the shelves.”

Many Africans find the mechanisms of the camera to be something of a revolutionary, if not mystical, concept. Some of them even believed at first that Bell’s camera was a weapon. Photography, he learned, comes with its own set of sensitivity standards. So, for the most part, Bell simply followed his instincts while minding his manners.

“As a photographer,” says Bell. “you’re always looking for that great shot, but you have to be bold but respectful. Tanzania and Zanzibar Island have a more Islamic influence, and I was told that it’s extremely disrespectful to their culture and religion to take photos without asking them first. In Zambia, Botswana, and South Africa, most enjoyed the camera, especially the children. Some of them had never seen themselves in the mirror, so they had no idea what they looked like.”

In Zambia, Bell was involved with humanitarian projects in the harshest of slums, saddest of orphanages, and grimiest of child prisons (yes, he did do some touristy things, such as participate in a safari trek). The lack of health-related institutions and basic human services in not just Zambia but all of Africa startled him. One of the most poignant images he captured there was of a group of energetic children stampeding through a schoolyard, free as only a gaggle of giggling kids can be, barreling blissfully past a posted sign –warning of the dangers of AIDS.

“There are so many areas with no hospitals, no ambulances, no health care, and no benefits of social cooperation through government.

“In La Coloma, Zambia, I was at a place with the highest concentration of AIDS orphans in the world. The tribes have very skewed views about how to get rid of AIDS, such as sleeping with a virgin. Contraceptives are demonic instruments of evil.”

In another photo, Bell managed to capture the distinct look of a mentally ill man named Alfred, a ragamuffin who at once seems gladsome and melancholic, tormented but at peace, disheveled yet dignified.

“In Zambia, there live some of the most weathered people I’d ever seen in my life,” says Bell. “Many are living in rags, meandering with no purpose. Through a translator of Swahili, I met Alfred. He couldn’t converse directly, but the photo nonverbally communicates a happy, troubled life.”

The children of Africa supplied Bell with further emotional strength to continue advocating global cooperation, greater encouragement to fight harder for the underprivileged, and the lasting impression of human dignity.

“They are beautiful, but many of them lack basic nutrients. Some have blonde hair at the tips due to the lack of nutrition and malnourishment,” says Bell who says he brought with him a suitcase full of toothbrushes and toys to distribute.

No matter where in Africa Bell strolled or sauntered – country or city, rural dirt road or paved lane – he says that children would race toward him from all four directions, ebullient, exuberant, and inquisitive as to the nature and meaning of the young, pale-skinned man’s visit. Perhaps not surprisingly, he had a hard time – even through a translator – explaining to these interested onlookers the hallowed staples of Montana life and legend, such as grizzly bears, fly-fishing, and heavy snowfall.

Perhaps a bit oddly, Bell says that visiting Africa wasn’t the culturally jarring experience he had anticipated, but that it was the return trip to the United States, following five weeks of participating in the African existence, which left him feeling maladjusted.

“It took me a whole month to re-assimilate. It’s hard not to get frustrated when you get back here to such a self-consumed culture.”

Looking back on his journey, Bell is most fond of the profoundly interpersonal nature of the sojourn, the mutual benefice he discovered rooted in the very universe of cultural symbiosis, human equality, and chance greetings.

“There was a huge need to help in Africa. What I found, though, is that Africans will help you out just as much as you help them out. They help you, too. There’s an exchange.”

Shane Bell’s photos of Africa will be on display at Food for Thought, 540 Daly Avenue, Missoula, throughout the month of October.

BACK

The Breach and Beyond

Clark Fork Coalition

One of my small pleasures is peering over the bridge as I head into work each morning to check out the flowing water of the Clark Fork River. As the staff scientist for the Clark Fork Coalition, these daily glimpses of river health give depth to the data on my computer screen as I check out the river by its numbers.

This summer, the numbers and the daily river view have been a bit out of the ordinary. And that’s due to the very extra-ordinary event of the one hundred-year-old Milltown Dam’s breach back in March. The historic re-joining of two great rivers, the Blackfoot and the Clark Fork, brought much fanfare…and a lot of mud.

As expected, we saw a big flush of sediment downstream, especially since dam breaching coincided with a three-year flood event. Now that the water is clear again, and the reams of monitoring data are compiled and mostly analyzed, we can assess the changes that flushing flows brought to the river below what used to be Milltown Dam. Here’s the scoop on the post-breach state of the Clark Fork.

The abundance of water scoured a century of accumulated silt from the Blackfoot River, flushing those sediments downriver in a single year instead of dragging the muddy impacts out over several years. And with plenty of water flowing all summer, we avoided the hot, fish-killing river temperatures of the past two years.

On the downside, along with “clean,” uncontaminated mud from the Blackfoot, the river also carried away sediment from the upper reservoir—above the massive construction zone you can see from the highway—and this sediment was definitely not so clean. (In the project area itself, the contaminated sediments remained safely bermed and bypassed.)

For several weeks during peak flows, suspended sediment in the river was much higher than average, but lower than an ice scour event in 1996 that killed fish downstream of the dam. Same with arsenic and copper associated with those sediments. Dissolved arsenic slightly exceeded the drinking water standard for one day following the breach, but it’s remained within safe levels ever since. As usual, the river is safe for swimming, fishing, and throwing sticks for your dog.

The river’s banks and beaches are safe too. After a short-lived spike in metal values in silty riverbed sediments, high flows mixed these more contaminated sediments with tons of cleaner material, effectively diluting it. Additional sampling of popular beaches this summer shows that arsenic levels are well below recreational standards, and there is no threat to human health.

And what about the fish? For the last several years, biologists with Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks have monitored both caged and radio-tagged rainbow trout above and below the dam. In 2006 and 2007, with the reservoir drawn down before the dam breach, nearly all of the caged fish below the dam died from a lethal combination of high temperatures and Milltown sediments.

But this year, after the dam breach, the fish fared much better. In fact, more fish perished in the Blackfoot River cages upstream than below the dam. However, there are clearly fishery impacts between Milltown and the Bitterroot River. Numbers of fish are down, and while we haven’t seen the aquatic insect data yet, it’s likely those numbers are down too.

Unlike caged fish, radio-tagged fish have options if they don’t like conditions in the river. They move. And for the first time in 100 years, trout could swim beyond the dam site. In fact, they did so in droves, heading up both the Blackfoot and Clark Fork Rivers. The number of trout per mile between Milltown and the Bitterroot is definitely lower this year. But the upshot is more trout upstream in the Clark Fork, as well as higher-than-average populations in the Blackfoot and the lower Bitterroot Rivers.

How long will these impacts last? A lot will depend on future flows and water temperatures. But one thing is certain – the river will be permanently better in the long term. With the dam and the worst contaminants gone, once the river heals it’ll be healed forever.

There’s more to this story – more data to collect, more results to analyze. Meantime, as data come in, we’re summarizing and posting results on our website “Beyond the Breach: A Guide to Water, Fish, and Sediments” available at http://www.clarkfork.org/water-watch/beyond-the-breach.html. Let us know what you see in the river as you watch the waters near you.

BACK
Just when you think you’re done...
Wrigly Field is home to the Chicago Cubs of the National League.

It ain’t over till it’s over.

Uttered by Hall-of-Fame catcher Yogi Berra to inspire his teammates to keep playing even when a win seemed out of reach, the phrase has taken on a more far-reaching meaning.

After a splendid week-long family vacation to Chicago recently, the 31-hour train ride back to Montana allowed me ample time to ponder the breadth of the Yankee slugger’s platitude.

Initially, my wife and I had planned a trip to the Windy City with our 3-year-old daughter merely to attend a wedding, but after exploring Chicago’s many amenities, it soon became clear we might as well make it a trip of a lifetime.

Chicago boasts some of this country’s finest museums, including the Chicago Children’s Museum, the Museum of Science and Industry, the Field Museum, the Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum, the Shedd Aquarium, and the Art Institute of Chicago. Add to that the great restaurants, architecture and music scene, and you can see how we’d have plenty to keep us busy.

But I had other reasons to want to see Chicago. My grandmother had immigrated there from Germany in 1909 and my mom had grown up in a north side neighborhood not far from Wrigley Field. And while I’d visited there a couple times as a small child, I really didn’t know the city at all.

Attending a Cubs’ game was on my “life list” and riding the subway was something I wanted my daughter to experience.

When my mom, who’s lived in Amarillo, Texas, for almost 60 years, found out we were planning a trip to her hometown, she volunteered to be our tour guide. To make the trip even more complete, she invited my brother and his family to come over from Hawaii and meet us there. (My brother’s son, Wiley, and our daughter, Rosalyn, were born on the same day, so getting the “astrotwins” together with Gramma in her hometown would be an extra special treat!)

Mom is 84, and at Christmastime she had undergone a very long and difficult open-heart surgery. A month earlier, the doctor had told her she needed the surgery to avert heart failure.

Faced with a number of complications that reduced her odds for survival, Mom didn’t hesitate to go under the knife. “Let’s get it over with,” she said. “I’ve got too much I want to do yet.”

When I visited her in January after her surgery, I feared she might not pull through. I certainly never expected she’d be showing us around Chicago nine months later.

From day one on our trip, Mom set the pace. After spending six hours tromping around the Museum of Science and Industry, she took us to dinner in her old neighborhood. Afterward we walked over to the apartment house my grandparents owned where Mom had grown up. Down the block, she showed us her best friend’s childhood home where she had met my dad on a blind date.

The next day we went to the Lincoln Park Zoo and walked to almost every exhibit. The day after, we took the kids to the Children’s Museum. And at the end of the day, while the kids ran and played in the fountain out front, Mom took a boat ride on the Chicago River to view the city’s architecture.

Later in the week, we took the subway downtown and had lunch on the 95th floor of the John Hancock building. It was something she wanted her grandchildren to experience. Afterward, we visited the cemetery where her grandmother and father were laid to rest, and then we drove out to Des Plaines to see her great uncle’s old summer home.

Conveying her own family history to her sons and grandchildren was very important to my mom. And the experience is something I will cherish for the rest of my life. I know plenty of people who will never have that experience, because they waited too late.

Earlier this year, I thought it was too late. Flying home to see Mom, I was rehearsing what I might say at her funeral. My eulogy included how I would go back to Chicago to get a taste of her old neighborhood. Who would have thought I’d get the chance to do it with her?

The day before we were to leave Chicago, my wife and brother and I took the kids to a day game at Wrigley Field. The first-place Cubs were playing the second-place Brewers and needed two more wins to clinch the division title. The game was sold out, but Mom had found us tickets on line. She didn’t care much about the game and opted to go shopping with my sister-in-law.

We all relished the experience – the hot dogs, beer, cotton candy, and peanuts – but the game was a bit of a disappointment. The Cubs were a little flat and were losing 6-2 at the bottom of the ninth inning with two outs and no runners on base.

People were streaming out of the stadium and my brother suggested we do the same. “Let’s go,” he said. “This game is over.”

Instinctively I said, “Hey. It ain’t over till it’s over.”

About that time, things started to happen -- a base hit followed by an RBI. Now it was 6-3. Another base hit, then another. Those fans that had stayed – and there were a lot of them – were going crazy. Catcher Geovany Soto was walking to the plate. The beleaguered pitcher hurled the white orb and Soto swatted it – out of the park!

The roar of the crowd rocked the 92-year-old stadium to its foundation. Tie game. Extra innings. Rosalyn fell asleep.

It’s hard to say how long the next three innings lasted, because time stood still. At last, the Cubs won it in the 12th.

Rosalyn awoke to the roar of the grateful fans. We had just witnessed one of the all-time great baseball games.

Thanks Yogi. And thanks Mom!

BACK
The Mystery of the Stone Forts

A number of years ago, when I first started volunteering at the Ravalli County Museum, I came across an intriguing photo taken by a legendary local photographer named Ernst Peterson. The picture showed a man with his back to the camera, crouched in a stoney circular perch looking out towards a small gently sloping meadow.

My job at the time was to identify and catalogue hundreds of historical photos that had yet to be entered into the system. A couple of wise and well-seasoned older gentlemen shared the job of trying to identify the assortment of photos, many of which came with little or no information. On this occasion both of my cohorts were completely baffled by the photo in question.

The only solid lead we had to go on was that it was definitely a Peterson photo. I filed the picture under the heading of Mountain Landscapes, and mentally added it to my list of odd things to investigate.

Nearly a year passed, and it seemed as if there would be no resolution to the problem of locating the site. Then, while pursuing an entirely different subject, I came across a short article entitled “The Mysterious Fort” by Ernst Peterson, and the photo published with the story was identical to the one we were trying to identify!

With a current Forest Service map and a copy of the Peterson article in hand, I soon zeroed in on a possible location of the phantom fort on the Continental Divide, near the western border of the Anaconda-Pintlar Wilderness. Enlisting the company of a couple of enthusiastic friends, we set out in the summer of 2001 with the full intention of finally locating the mysterious fort. We soon discovered however that the area had been scorched by wildfires the year before and the landscape had been drastically altered as a result.

Still, we felt certain that we were in the right area when we came out along the lower edge of the small meadow shown in the photograph. The long low saddle depicted in the photo appeared invitingly above us to the west, even more distinguishable now that the timber had been burned across the width of it.

A number of solitary rock outcrops were visible along the horizon standing in sharp contrast to the burned timber, but none of them looked like they might be concealing stone forts. A large rocky knob stood alone to our right, and we quickly decided to cross the meadow and climb to the top of it to see if we could spot the forts.

As we clambered up the backside of it to get a better view of our surroundings, we soon realized that there was no reason to search any further. Spreading out from where we stood was a well-defined series of low rock walls working their way in both directions around the stoney peak. As we carefully followed the walls around to the front of the summit, we eventually found ourselves standing in the very pit portrayed in Peterson’s photo.


We counted over a dozen pits of various sizes, some were actually quite large, and the same string of low rock walls linked all the pits together in a well-concealed network of defensible space. Remarkably, not a single wall or pit is detectable from any view of the mountain, other than while standing right there inside the actual fortress.

In his article Peterson speculates that the fort was used by Blackfeet warriors to spy on the comings and goings of the Salish and Nez Perce Indians as they traveled to and from their buffalo hunting grounds east of the divide. Judging by the clear view afforded from the top of the stoney knob, it’s quite apparent that someone used it for exactly that purpose.

It’s also obvious that the mountain prominence could serve as a strategic location to fire down upon one’s enemy. As an added convenience, and an absolute necessity during any prolonged sieges, a refreshing spring of cold clear water bubbles out of the rocks just a short distance from the stronghold.

In 1834, Warren Angus Ferris reported that he had seen Indian fortifications in the vicinity as he crossed from the Bitter Root to the Big Hole Valley while returning from a trading expedition to the Flathead country.

In his journal Ferris relates that on May 12th the party “crossed the mountain without difficulty, and encamped at the edge of the Big Hole. We saw several forts, made by the Blackfeet since we passed here last fall.” If these are indeed the stoney relics photographed by Peterson, then we might assume that they were built while Ferris was trading among the Salish near Flathead Lake.

His description of the pass as noted the year before seems to fit the geography perfectly. On that occasion he and his men had seen smoke rising from the mountaintop, but when they arrived at the pass later in the day there was no sign of any recent activity. Ferris says that they stopped at noon for two hours “on a small prairie, on the summit of the mountain, then descended the steep north side to the Bitter Root River.”

Earlier in his journal Ferris mentioned an incident that took place in August of 1831, where four members of another trapping party reportedly fought a daylong battle with a band of Blackfeet at Gray’s Hole in present-day Idaho. On the morning after the skirmish the besieged trappers found that their enemies had laid low for the night in “twenty-four stone pens where they had slept.”

The incident seems to confirm the fact that the Blackfeet utilized stone fortifications, but we may never know for sure who really constructed the fortress that Ernst Peterson visited and photographed more than a century later. Similar rock forts are known to exist west of Flathead Lake, which has been a Salish and Kootenai stronghold for countless generations. Another stone fortress overlooks the wide divide at Lewis and Clark Pass north of Lincoln, which was a well-known route used by the Salish and Nez Perce Indians during their buffalo hunts. In some places along that trail the ruts are still evident where their horse-drawn travois’ scraped a lasting impression on the weathered earth.

The forts, or “battle pits” found near Flathead Lake, have been loosely linked to a mythical tribe of Indians known as the Koyokees, who may have inhabited the region surrounding Flathead Lake long before the Salish moved north from the Bitter Root Valley.

According to one old Kootenai Chief named Baptiste Mathias, “the Koyokees liked to fight a lot, and they were bad people. They fought everywhere, Tobacco Plains, along the Kootenai River, it happened everywhere…I think that these Koyokees are the ones who built these pits.”

Another Kootenai tribesman has also suggested that the Koyokees were actually Iroquois Indians who came west with the Canadian trapping and trading expeditions of the early 1800’s. Thomas James may have recorded one of the earliest known sightings of a stone fortress in Montana in 1810, when he described one used by Crow Indians on the Upper Yellowstone. Captain Clark, of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, reported seeing a wooden fortress in the same area on his return trip from the Pacific in 1806.

Recently, while looking through some of Ernst Peterson’s photos and correspondence, I came upon a large manila envelope marked “Manuscript-Historical Old Fort.” Inside were two more photos of the Mysterious Fort, and a detailed 14-page report that he had written in 1967.

Apparently he had a general idea of the location of the obscure fortification, and in mid July of 1948, he and a hiking partner set out with high hopes of solving the mystery. In his manuscript Peterson provides us with an interesting personal account of his initial attempt at finding the fort.

“A hot summer day slowed our climbing progress, and as we neared the divide a sudden ominous, and what appeared as a normal summer thunderstorm, was just cause for us to take refuge in a grove of fir trees. Two hours later found us in the same grove with the storm increasing its intensity and turning to snow. We were forced to find a place with water to make camp, and had to shoulder our packs again and head through what became a blizzard.”

The men wandered along the divide half lost and half frozen until they finally reached a guard station that was used in case of emergencies by the Forest Service, where they “holed up” for the next thirty-six hours.

Occasionally they would venture out in the six to eight inches of snow to try and track down any trace of the fort, but would soon return to the cabin to dry out and warm up. Peterson described his pursuit of the elusive fort as being “on the trail of something akin to the Phantom Gold Mine, a will-o-the-wisp of a myth that existed, but no one knew where.

We finally gave up our quest and returned to the valley, the location and existence of the fort to remain a mystery.” After making two more trips in August, he finally found the fort less than three hundred yards from where he had floundered by it in the July snowstorm.

BACK



If you have any questions, please Contact Us or phone (406-375-8580). © Copyright Clark Fork Journal. All rights reserved.